<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Debugging Software &#187; multi core</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.replaysolutions.com/tag/multi-core/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.replaysolutions.com</link>
	<description>Discussing Software Debugging Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 23:02:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Even Intel struggles with this stuff&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.replaysolutions.com/2009/12/intel-larrabee-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.replaysolutions.com/2009/12/intel-larrabee-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Lindo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software Debugging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defect resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel Larrabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi core]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.replaysolutions.com/blog/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the past few years Intel has been steadily working on bringing an exceptional step forward in processing capability to market. They internally called it Larrabee and it is a chip that is widely rumored to have as many as 32 or more cores on the chip. This would bring multi-core parallel computing to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the past few years Intel has been steadily working on bringing an exceptional step forward in processing capability to market. They internally called it <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larrabee_%28GPU%29">Larrabee </a>and it is a chip that is widely rumored to have as many as 32 or more cores on the chip. This would bring multi-core parallel computing to the consumer market in an unprecedented way.</p>
<p>Recently, however, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704825504574580092037451258.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_sections_business">news came out</a> that at least the first iteration of this chip was being officially canned. Although it&#8217;s not unheard of for a big company like Intel to sack a project, in this case the number of man years, resources and buzz built up around Larrabee represented a substantial investment on Intel&#8217;s part.</p>
<p><strong>This news for me really drove home the challenges that the computing and software industry is facing as we continue to attempt to scale out as opposed to up</strong>. To build more processors on a chip instead of faster ones. To fundamentally change the way we design and implement hardware and the applications that run on them.</p>
<p>This stuff is hard! Really hard, in fact. And although the concept of putting a bunch of processors together on a chip is simple, actually harnessing that power to do real work is anything but. There are many reasons for this, but one is that writing multi-threaded software that actually can tap into this power is exceptionally more challenging that just waiting for Intel or AMD to produce another CPU that is 50% faster than the last.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to conject exactly what stopped Larrabee in its tracks as it was seemingly so close to launch. What we do know is there was a tremendous amount of horsepower built into the chip, but tapping that potential apparently proved elusive. A public demonstration of Larrabee at a recent trade event was met with a relative &#8216;Hmmm&#8230;where&#8217;s the beef&#8217; kind of reaction from the press and analysts.</p>
<p><strong>This, in essence, is exactly why we&#8217;re here</strong>. As the hardware scales out with multi-core and the applications get more complex, the tools and infrastructure needed to support them, including <a href="http://replaysolutions.com/">debugging tools</a> and defect resolution solutions, need to grow and evolve as well. And this is what Replay is all about &#8211; making the problem resolution process manageable so that enterprises can move forward with creating scalable and distributed complex applications.</p>
<p>I will be anxious to see what AMD and NVIDIA are working on in their respective labs as each race against each other and Intel to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore%27s_law">keep up with Mr. Moore</a>. It&#8217;s an exciting time as the industry looks for innovation from our hardware and software vendors to keep up the pace of advancement that we&#8217;ve grown to expect&#8230;</p>
<p>Onward and outward!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.replaysolutions.com/2009/12/intel-larrabee-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

